Because we start school so late in Washington (typically after Labor Day), we ended our first semester in the second-to-last week of January. I’ve had some thoughts about the first semester simmering in the weeks since then, and I figured I’d finish typing them up here as part of my continuous reflection process.
More personalized questions!
There are many ways to provide communicatively-embedded comprehensible input to students, from storytelling to content-based instruction. I have adjusted my balance this year toward sharing even more pictures, videos, infographics, etc. from the German-speaking world and discussing them with students in comprehensible language. Somehow, I feel like I haven’t been using enough personalized questions to connect the content to my students.
Last year, I leaned heavily into Card Talk, which loans itself very well to learning more about the people in the room and building connections between them, and that helped me know so much about the people in my classes. I don’t feel that same level of connection this year, so I want to be more purposeful about connecting with my students and connecting them to the content, either by doing more Card Talk with students, or by planning more personalized questions related to the content I plan to teach about.
Move from just comprehension to language use
This somewhat relates to my previous reflection, which is that it seems a lot of my questioning has stayed lower-level (yes/no, this or that questions) or just comprehension checking (“What did I just say?” “Does _ mean this or that?”). I went to an excellent Garbanzo webinar last week about questioning, and was reaffirmed in my commitment to using questioning to advance language acquisition. It’s also making me consider more how I use questioning to advance discourse in my classes.
It is helpful to remember how new language feels SO new to our students – it’s all brand new combinations of sometimes unfamiliar sounds! Lingering on new language until it feels very confident, and then adding one detail at a time helps build out communication more solidly. Just using one question word, using processing questions to get repetitions on the new information, and only adding additional info after eliciting confident reactions to questions about all the previous info will be key to building more extended discourse, instead of just series of isolated simple sentences.
Chat Mats, the Reawakening
I see the value in having Chat Mats for students. They feel that the language is at their fingertips, and the supports help them get input because they are more or less just reading the language off the mat. But I’ve struggled with feeling like I’m using them like giant vocabulary lists, expecting students to acquire all the rich language after what feels like a “reasonable” amount of time, rather than acknowledging that they are supports for tasks and the language will take its time to get acquired.
My colleague Missy told our PLC that she gives each class a single chat mat, and lets them use them for an extended period, like a week or two at a time. She lets them chat with each other about the chat mat’s topic, and challenges them to see how long they can keep in the Target Language, how many juicy follow up questions they can ask in the language, and how much they can learn about their partners. Students naturally rise to those challenges, and increase in their ability to stay in the TL and build their confidence.
What’s even better – she gives the same mats to every level! Even upper level students need time to revisit “old” language, and feel the growth they’ve experienced since they first “learned” those linguistic skills. The conversations are more confident, richer, more exciting for them. I can see trying this more as a great way to recycle older language, and give students a marker on their path of language acquisition that helps make clear how much they have grown.
Gestures work great!
If we have told any class stories with targeted vocabulary, I have been very consistent this year with teaching gestures as part of establishing the meaning of the new phrases, as well as reviewing older gestures for other targeted vocab. Kids every year write about how much they appreciate gestures, and they are eating it up this year. The other day, a student forgot the next word in our class password, and I did the gesture, which helped unblock their brains and get the entire (correct) password out. Getting stuff into the body works so well!
Research backs this up, and ever since I have leaned more into TPR in my classes, I have seen lots of easy growth in my students’ vocabulary. For a video I’m teaching after we get back from our midwinter break, I have already planned to TPR some of the vocabulary before we even watch the video, and I know that students are going to feel so comfortable with that vocab by the time it comes up in the story of the video. More gestures! Across levels! More!
WTF is my curriculum
This…is a yearly reflection. I am not tied to a curriculum at my school, which is a blessing and a curse. I get to decide everything my students learn, and I also have to decide everything my students learn. As a result, after I “cover” the “expected stuff” in my first two levels (hobbies, family and friends, school, food, cities, travel, houses, etc.), it’s kind of the Wild West as to what we’re going to learn next.
I decided over the summer that my goal is for every themed unit to center a marginalized group in German-speaking society, and got excited about making this happen. There are so many possibilities for me to learn more, and to open my students’ eyes to the world as it truly is outside of our little suburban bubble. Our unit about housing can center accessibility, the “hobbies” unit can center Black and LGBTQ+ German speakers, “foods” can explore the diversity of food cultures across the German-speaking world and the influences of immigrant food cultures on the German-language food scenes, etc etc. The possibilities are endless and so interesting to me from a curriculum design standpoint. But! These units are still in the “wouldn’t that be nice?” phase of design. I just haven’t had the time to solidly plan them out, and that’s okay.
This year, I have been teaching a unit to my upper level class about art in the German-speaking world that builds up to learning about the “Ausstellung Entartete Kunst” (“Degenerate Art Exhibit”) that the Nazis put on in the 30s to ridicule Expressionists, Impressionists, Jewish artists, and others. It feels like a really powerful way to learn about censorship, othering, and the variety of -isms that are brewing to the surface in our society right now. I have had the idea to teach this unit for a long time, but it was only seeing Carrie Toth’s “Bajo la mesa” unit that finally gave me a structure and ideas of how to incorporate lots of rich language into our studies of visual art, which admittedly is not my personal forte. But having someone else’s work to bounce my ideas against has been very powerful, and I’m grateful for the inspiration it has provided.
The conclusion that I’m coming to is that it will all just take time. I can only make and find new resources for a couple units each year before my brain gets overloaded with building the plane while flying it, so I am trying to be content with the new that I create, as well as the less-than-perfect old that I sometimes have to rely on. That’s okay! I also do well when I have a model to look at and build off of. Carrie’s unit is necessarily different than mine – hers is based on a music video that I don’t have for German, and my ultimate end goal is some informational texts about a Nazi art exhibit – but accessing someone else’s thinking is great way to see what works for me, what doesn’t, and where I need to go to plan the next improvement. If I can only revamp a unit or two every year, that is fine, because it just has to be. Everything will be okay.
Diversity, equity, and inclusion are the point
The new government has been launching an all-out attack on marginalized groups across our country, and it has been horrifying to witness. It affirms to me that although ideally, every student would come away from my program with Intermediate-level proficiency or better in German, what I really want is for them to understand the joys and benefits of diversity, equity, and inclusion, and to fight for them in their own ways in their own lives.
They will work and live in a world of diverse backgrounds and experiences, and need to be able to meet diversity with warmth and curiosity in order to thrive.
They will discover unjust systems through their lives, and need tools of critical thought to push towards equity for all.
There are forces in the world that seek to dehumanize and eradicate historically marginalized identities in grabs for power, and the use of inclusive practices is not only most likely to achieve the goals that we set for our students, but also model for students how to live in a democracy where all are truly equal and free.
I wish for teachers to not self-censor, to show the world exactly as it is to our students, and prepare them to make a better future for all. It will not be easy, but it will be the right thing to do.